Papers with crowdsourcing workers
Evaluating the Evaluation of Diversity in Natural Language Generation (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for controlling diversity by tuning a “decoding parameter” affect form but not meaning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that measures correlation between a diversity metric and a parameter that controls some aspect of diversity in generated text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in estimating diversity . it shows that humans outperformed existing methods but affect form but not meaning . |
LMTurk: Few-Shot Learners as Crowdsourcing Workers in a Language-Model-as-a-Service Framework (2022.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work shows that large-scale pretrained language models (PLMs) are effective few-shot learners. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that treats few-shotlearners as crowdsourcing workers . they propose to use these workers to train models that solve a task well . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach treats few-shotlearners as crowdsourcing workers . the resulting annotations can be utilized to train models that solve the task well . |
TurkingBench: A Challenge Benchmark for Web Agents (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Kevin Xu, Yeganeh Kordi, Tanay Nayak, Adi Asija, Yizhong Wang, Kate Sanders, Adam Byerly, Jingyu Zhang, Benjamin Van Durme, Daniel Khashabi
| Challenge: | TurkingBench is a benchmark consisting of tasks presented as web pages with textual instructions and multi-modal contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose to use HTML pages to perform various annotation tasks on crowdsourcing platforms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms other models on the TurkingBench benchmark. |
Constructing Highly Inductive Contexts for Dialogue Safety through Controllable Reverse Generation (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detect toxic generation of pretrained language models rely on templates, data extraction, crowdsourcing workers or automatic generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to construct adversarial contexts conditioned on a given response . they augment existing dataset BAD+ and construct a new dataset B AD+ . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can detect toxic or biased content in large pretrained language models. |